Sex Offender Registration During the Pandemic: ‘A Recipe for Disaster’

Print More
sex offender

Photo by Scarlet Lohan via Flickr

The coronavirus pandemic has led to an unprecedented shutdown of many American institutions, from professional sports to many government agencies, including the suspension of many non-essential law enforcement services from fingerprinting to vehicle registration.

However, people required to register under the complex public sex offense registry scheme must still register in person. This puts the health of registrants, their families, agency employees, police officers, and the general public in danger.

Over the past month, I have searched press releases, news reports and social media posts, along with direct contact with law enforcement agents, to determine what changes have been made to sex offense registration during this pandemic.

Of the 182 agency responses, only a dozen have suspended registration, and just 44 agencies are taking registry over the phone or Internet. The rest still require in-person registration.

Some agencies tried to reassure registrants their safety has been taken under consideration. Several police agencies have placed barriers in offices and required appointments to be made to limit the number of registered persons at the stations.

I believe these agencies could do more.

In reviewing registry office reactions to COVID-19, I’ve come to realize just how confusing registration laws can be in America. Some states require registration with the state police; others at the sheriff’s office or local police station; and some have to register at multiple agencies.

Many agencies posted notices on social media outlets like Facebook or NextDoor, two websites that prohibit Registered Persons from creating accounts.

It’s not surprising that Registered Persons are confused by the registration laws—even without the added complication of a global pandemic.

Here are a few examples of the vastly different registration duties during this pandemic:

  • In Greely, Co., registration is conducted over the phone, but in Weld County, where Greely is located, registration is still being conducted at the Weld County Courthouse.
  • In Mississippi, all of the state’s estimated 11,000 registrants must update their registration at one of only nine state Highway Patrol stations instead of the local Sheriff’s offices, placing a huge travel burden on some registrants.
  • In Florida’s Palm Beach County, criminal registration is conducted over the phone, but sex offense registration is still being conducted in-person.
  • Pinal County, Arizona and Hernando County, Florida, suspended all fingerprinting services except for sex offense registration.
  • The Broward County(Fla.) courthouse closed to the public, moving registration to the Probation office in a different building a block away.
  • In Texas, registrants cannot renew their driver’s license annually due to office, and must contact the local registration office to express their intent to follow this law; the burden to watch for reopening of agency offices falls on the registrant.
  • Jasper County, Iowa is conducting registration by phone but will be conducting random compliance checks at the registrant’s home.
  • Registrants in Caddo Parish, Louisiana must register at the Caddo Correctional Center and be subjected to a health screening before being allowed to register.

Reactions to sex offense registrations during COVID-19 on a state level have also varied immensely.

Hawaii Suspends In-Person Registration

Hawaii passed an executive order suspending in-person registration. In Oregon, registrants must contact their local police agency to see if they accept over-the-phone registration, and if their agency is unavailable, the registrant must contact the state police.

New Mexico granted local agencies the authority, but not the obligation, to conduct registration by phone. North Dakota allowed registration forms to be completed by phone. Ohio and Oklahoma have stated they were making no changes to in-person registration.

In Michigan, a federal judge placed a temporary restraining order on sex offense registration, but in California, lawsuits filed to suspend in-person registration have been rejected by the courts. Pennsylvania suspended all in-person registration; registrants can download a form on the state police website and send in the completed form by mail.

In the landmark Supreme Court decision of Smith v Doe (2003), the act of sex offense registration was upheld under John Robert’s oral argument that Alaska’s by-mail registration scheme was no more intrusive than a “Price Club” application.

The majority of sex-offender registrations in America are conducted in person, mostly in busy police stations or courthouses across the country. Many registrants are poor and rely on public transportation, and roughly a fifth of registrants are over the age of 55.

Many Registered Persons also have families of their own; thus, continuing to require in-person registration in a recipe for disaster.

Apathy towards Registered Persons has not been limited to natural disasters; registrants have been denied shelter during natural disasters or extremes in temperatures. But if law enforcement agencies are concerned enough about COVID-19 to suspend vehicle registrations, fingerprinting services, and accident reports, the same can be done for the sex offense registry.

The public sex offense registry was created in response to a handful of rare, stranger kidnappings. In reality, most sex crimes occur at home, by someone known to the victim and who is far more likely than not to have no prior criminal record.

Recidivism has always been low among those convicted of sex offenses (less than 1 percent annually), although the registry increases social ostracism which in turn could increase the likelihood of re-offense.

At least some police agencies have recognized the registry is not an “essential” service during this pandemic. I believe this service is unnecessary even in the best of times.

My own registration duty was performed this month in person.

Derek Logue

Derek Logue

The registration officer met me outside the Law Enforcement Center to have me sign a piece of paper. She was wearing a surgical mask, while all I had was an ill-fitting paper mask.

Within days of my in person registration, the nearby Smithfield meatpacking factory reported a major outbreak.

Is placing my life at risk worth a mere signature?

Derek W. Logue is a Nebraska registrant and activist for the rights of returning citizens, and founder of the sex offense education and reform website


9 thoughts on “Sex Offender Registration During the Pandemic: ‘A Recipe for Disaster’

  1. People on the sex offender registry are human beings, too. Has this become a country where certain people no longer have any constitutional rights? If so, then our country has fallen into the category of some of the worst third world countries in the world.

    There is now abundant research showing that the recidivism rates for those committing a sex offense is in the single digits when taken collectively. By forcing the thousands of registrants to register in person, rather than by phone or online during this crisis, is barbaric.

    This is why so many of us at Florida Action Committee are working to reform current policies in relation to those on the registry.

  2. Women Against advocates AGAINST any registry at all as there are a myriad of studies indicating all that money (wages and salaries). all those resources (equipment, training, etc) squandered when it could have been more wisely directed to job training, college classes, decent meals, etc to fulfil the concept of getting a human being ready to reintegrate into society starting the day they enter a prison. But, relying on our proverbial ‘backing into the problem’ based on what works best at another prison in another state or political grandstanding by making the public ‘feel safe’ as legislators have stated. Forget doing what they are paid for. That being wise shepherds of their constituents money. So, here we are with jails refusing to take any more detainees, prisons illegally warehousing human beings over capacity in unsanitary, unsafe dorms or pods where the mantra is not if COVID19 gets into their facility but when and the impending death of many. Again, here we are twiddling our thumbs after all these weeks……decisions derived from empirical research data from researchers, academics and others such as the PEW Research group. How about shorter imprisonments, doing away with mandatory minimums and focusing on something besides punishment on top of registry punishment. Annihilation is not the goal.

    • PRE -SORNA RETROACTIVE APPLICATION is going to come back and Bit. It unconstitutional, illegal. The Supreme Court Ruled SLAVERY was Legal!!! How can a Civil Regulation carry a Long Prison sentence. We want REVENGE!!!

  3. If things don’t change then soon we will really have nothing to lose.
    The United States of America has declared war on us. This becoming more and more evident.
    I am not trying to foment any illegal action. I am simply making an

  4. Sex Offender laws take away from the original meaning of Due Process, and legal Court sentencing by Courts, and Judges. The reason why we have Courts, Judges, and legal proceedings under Due Process is so that Prosecutors, or people from any Jurisdiction cannot be vindictive or punitive giving out excessive punishments, and so that they will not be Judge and Jury… Sex offender laws have taken away the power from the Courts and added on additional excessive punishments through the use of legislation. This Violates multiple Constitutional Issues when argued appropriately.

    In one example see recent 6th circuit ruling in Michigan.. Legislators try to regulate and legislate everything these days based on safety as if they have a blank check to change and construe law to fit their version of a more perfect world while skirting around the Constitution. If its for the reason of Safety then it must be ok to take away guaranteed protected rights. How is it even possible that Guaranteed protected rights can be taken away? This doesnt make any sense.. Im not saying sex offenders should be excused from any legal punishments but they were already punished, served their time, and released. Sex offending is not a disease its a choice that can be changed. But punishments should be left up to the Courts and not people who create registries. Nobody can punish you for exercising your guaranteed protected right to remain silent, and if they do They then create a second class Citizen forced into servitude without due process of law. Even in a trial for any crime you do not have to speak, and can stay silent. So how can anyone force you to speak, and give any information beyond identity against your will? Yea you might get convicted of failure to register, but as long as you do not plea bargain youll have opportunities to fight it all the way up to the Supreme Court..
    [this comment has been condensed for space and clarity]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *