Defying Gun Rights Activists, Virginia Presses Ahead With Controls

Print More

Pro-gun activists rally in Virginia this month. Photo by Mobilus in mobili via Flickr

Virginia’s position as the new ground zero of the national gun control debate was reinforced Thursday, as the Democratic-controlled legislature pushed ahead with restrictive measures that have angered gun rights activists across the country.

Legislators adopted  a series of measures that effectively answered a massive pro-gun rally in Richmond earlier this month and had spurred counties in Virginia and elsewhere to declare themselves as Second Amendment sanctuaries, the New York Times reports.

Supporters of the measures made no secret of their determination to counter the gun lobby.

Speaking on the House floor, Delegate Patrick Hope, a Democrat, said all of the Democratic bills would save lives and that similar measures already are doing so in other states.

“For too many years this body has put the convenience of gun owners above all else,” he said, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Along mostly party-line votes, measures approved by the House of Delegates included:

      • Limiting handgun purchases to one each month
      • Requiring background checks for all firearms sales and transfers, and
      • Imposing a “red flag” law that allows the confiscation of guns from people deemed by courts to be dangerous to themselves or others.

The Senate has approved four gun limits, including limiting handgun purchases, allowing municipalities to ban guns in certain public areas, and background checks.

Gov. Ralph Northam has said he will sign gun restrictions, which would still require redrafting next month to reconcile different language from the two chambers before final legislative passage.

One reason Virginia politicians are now favoring gun control measures is illustrated by a stretch off land near the capital in Richmond where a Democrat won a state Senate seat from a Republican last fall.

Once rural areas have been developed into housing that attracts young professionals.

The newcomers often have brought different, more liberal political sensibilities, becoming a potent force on gun safety issues. Democrat Ghazala Hashmi won a Senate seat, defeating Glen Sturtevant Jr., a Republican incumbent who had been endorsed by the National Rifle Association.

In interviews this week with about two dozen people who live in her Senate district, many supported restrictions on firearms to prevent gun violence, including suicides.

Soon after Democrats won control of the Virginia general assembly in November, for the first time in more than two decades, a backlash emerged that effectively turned the state into the latest battleground over gun rights, the New Yorker reported.

Everytown for Gun Safety, the gun-control group founded by Michael Bloomberg, had spent two and a half million dollars in Virginia in 2019, eight times more than the National Rifle Association.

The gun debate reflects demographic changes that have dramatically widened divisions between the dense liberal population in Richmond, the Washington suburbs, and around its universities, and a conservative majority in its rural areas.

In the weeks after the election, a backlash began. Dozens of counties and municipalities declared themselves gun-rights “sanctuaries,” language lifted from the immigrant-rights movement.

2 thoughts on “Defying Gun Rights Activists, Virginia Presses Ahead With Controls

  1. Red flag laws transfer powers from licensed psychiatrists to unqualified persons more obedient to democrats, e.g., local judges and crotchety old aunts. Due process requires reports from two psychiatrists, one from each side, legal representation, arraignment, indictment and trial by jury.

    Nobody wants criminals to have firearms but to be taken seriously, if the accused is a danger to himself (not against the law) or others, he should be legally arrested. In other words, take the man but leave the guns. The line of inheritance codified in state laws determines the legal custodian of any property.

    Why object to “universal” background checks? These laws would severely punish tens of millions of mourning widows who failed to run background checks on those who were promised their dead husbands’ firearms. Usually, those would be their children.

    What democrats really want is to register transfers between mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, uncles, cousins, friends, and neighbors. They’re after inheritances, bequeathals, gifts and sales of inherited collections, however small they are.

    But amid all this high hysteria, democrats ignore and hope we won’t notice the fact that all the major crime indicators are trending downward. Bloomberg wants everyone to believe the nation is in crisis, suffering an epidemic, but folks, there is no crisis, no epidemic. They don’t want to admit that it’s OK for government to declare victory and watch the crime rates decline.

  2. By their actions the sick Depraved Democrats have become an “illegitimate” gov body. They are suppressing 1st and 2nd amendments. Warping the minds of the next generations. They are FAR out of step with the bulk of the population and backed by billionaires. They need to be nationally declared Illegitimate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *