End Over-Policing and ‘Under-Protection,’ Activist Tells Violence Summit

Print More
police

Photo by Arash Azizzada via Flickr

Reducing violence and increasing safety requires building trust between the police and marginalized communities, a conference on violence prevention was told Wednesday

In order to build trust between communities of color and the police, law enforcement’s historical legacy of oppressing people of color, and its modern manifestations, need to be acknowledged and changed, said Myesha Braden, director of the Criminal Justice Project of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.

Myesha Braden

Myesha Braden

“Until we have provided truth, until we have ended harm, until we have established justice, reconciliation between police and the communities that they serve is impossible,” Braden said at a conference hosted by the National Network for Safe Communities at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

The parallels between the harmful behavior by police during the periods of slavery and Jim Crow segregation, and their current actions need to be recognized, Braden said.

“The community of people of color in the United States yet again have reason to say that the police are not here for us,” Braden said.

“The police are here to enforce an institution that sees us as second class. That is something that existed at that time. It is something that exists now.”

Not only does this harm need to be acknowledged, it needs to be stopped, Braden asserted, identifying killings by police as the primary issue that needs to be addressed.

“It is no longer sufficient, and it is harmful to reconciliation efforts, if police do not acknowledge that they can no longer be comfortable with the number of police killings, especially in communities of color,” Braden said.

“It is no longer OK for police organizations every time, as a reflex action, to come out and provide justification for a police killing.”

Braden pointed out the similarities between current-day hot-spot policing and slave patrols of the past, and explained that communities of color with a large police presence are not safe. Policing in these communities focuses on revenue-raising practices like issuing fines and fees rather than stopping violence, she maintained.

“The over-policing and under-protection of communities must end,” Braden said.

Toni McNeil, an organizer for Faith in the Valley, a five-county faith-based grass-roots organization in central California, said that while effective law enforcement is needed to keep communities safe, safety can and should be upheld by members of the community.

This is possible when leadership and responsibility among community members is established, she said.

“The truth of the matter is the majority of the people in the community care about the people in the community,” McNeil said.

Maria Trovato is a TCR staff writer and news intern.

One thought on “End Over-Policing and ‘Under-Protection,’ Activist Tells Violence Summit

  1. This is the biggest croc of an article I’ve read recently. Unfortunately it’s not so far out there to be so considered. Why?

    Because all of the buzzwords are here: marginalized community – what does that mean? Police killings – what does that mean. Does the author here refer to uses of force by the police against bad guys? Bad guys that engage the cops and then expect little or no response?

    She notes that the “police see us as second class citizens,” do they? Where’s the evidence of such? And, perhaps it’s the minority community (whatever that means) itself that sees themselves as second class citizens. I know of know copper anywhere. No judge. No prosecutor. No criminal justice professional that sees anyone as a second class citizen. A criminal, yes. A second class citizen, not at all.

    And cops need to apologize to the minority community (whatever that means) for enforcing the law? Let us remember that it was not the cops in any era, any season, that makes the laws, their job was to enforce laws that were passed by the legislature (it’s in the Constitution). Thus, the cops should not and need not apologize for doing their job.

    In fact, I would suggest that no one should apologize for anything. What’s the point?Does it change anything? Why not move forward, live in the present and/or the future, but definitely not the past. That’s the problem. Too many people being Jethro Tull (Living in the Past) and not moving on with their lives. People who want to be offended will be. People who want to see the worst in others will.

    This has got to end. Only end will the police and community have a stronger relationship.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.