Interracial Crime Study Finds Whites More Likely to Assault Blacks Than the Reverse

Print More
crime tape

Photo by Alan Cleaver via Flickr

Whites are more likely to assault and use weapons against African Americans and Hispanics than the reverse, according to a study in the International Review of Law and Economics

The study, based in part on data obtained from the Los Angeles Police Department for the years 2000 to 2007 on interracial “face to face” crimes, found that whites were roughly 13 percent more likely to assault African Americans and Hispanics, and that whites were approximately 0.5 percent more likely to use weapons against them than those two ethnic groups are likely to use weapons against whites.

The study authors restricted their analysis to four types of “face-to-face” crime: homicide, robbery, assault, and weapon use, noting that “conditional on the suspect and victim being white, Hispanic or black [. . .] these four crimes account for 66 percent of reported crime.”

In interactions between blacks and Hispanic suspects and white victims, blacks and Hispanics were found less likely to assault whites and more likely to commit robbery and weapons crimes against Whites than the reverse.

Face-to-face crimes involving a white suspect and a white victim are most likely to be assaults, while incidents that pair a white suspect with a black or Hispanic victim are more likely to involve robbery, assault and weapons use.

The pattern of violence shown in the study produced a picture at variance with previous research drawing from aggregate data, the authors said.

“Blacks/Hispanics assault and use weapons against Whites more often than Whites assault and use weapons against Blacks/Hispanics, but these relationships flip once we control for neighborhood and time effects in a panel data setting,” the authors wrote.

The pattern of whites committing acts of violence against blacks and Hispanics was found to be consistent across most of Los Angeles.

“We observe this pattern of violence committed by white individuals across almost all types of neighborhoods in Los Angeles County, and the pattern is stronger in neighborhoods that are wealthier and have a greater population density of white individuals,” the authors said.

The study, published in December 2018, was conducted by Gregory DeAngelo of Claremont Graduate University; R. Kaj Gittings of Texas Tech University; and Anita Alves Pena of Colorado State University.

Of all reported crimes, 37.7 percent identify the race of the suspect and victim. Of that fraction of reported crimes, 75.1 percent involved suspects and victims whose race was either white, African American, or Hispanic.

In relation to all reported crimes in Los Angeles, assaults were found to be more likely among whites, blacks, and Hispanics. This group comprised 41.8 percent of assaults, which is 14.5 percent of all reported crimes.

Variance over time in neighborhood arrest rates, policing practices, economic conditions, and demographic changes were included in the analysis. These elements contribute to changes in the cost-benefit analysis of committing crime, general racial attitudes, and social norms which may change over time.

A full copy of the report can be downloaded here. Access is restricted to members of the host website, but a copy of the study can be purchased.

This summary was prepared by TCR news intern John Ramsey. Readers’ comments are welcome.

22 thoughts on “Interracial Crime Study Finds Whites More Likely to Assault Blacks Than the Reverse

  1. “whites were roughly 13 percent more likely to assault African Americans and Hispanics”

    Quite right. Considering we have 5 times the population as blacks, that should transpose into 500% assault rate, not 13%. Keep in mind this study comes from a minority majority city. Whites make up 28% of the population.

    There is an old adage, “Figures don’t lie, but liars figure.”

      • the article is anti white propaganda. it is equating the NUMBER of assaults with the RATE at which the assaults are made. these are two different things. a larger population can create more assaults because they are larger in number, not because they are violent. if a smaller population commits assaults at a higher RATE (such as blacks and hispanics), that means, despite having fewer overall assaults, they commit more assaults per person than the larger population, thus, being more violent than the larger population.

        • If whites comprise only 28% of LA’s population, then your posit that they commit more assaults because of greater numbers can’t be true.

  2. Disagreement from the usuals suspects who simply can’t accept that they ever do ANYTHING wrong, they’re such angels. Even the current FBI hate crime stats say the same thing though, that whites commit the majority of hate crimes.

  3. Only because most racially-motivated violence against white people doesn’t get charged as a hate crime. A few examples: –
    – Black rapist urinates on white gang rape victim while saying “that’s for 400 years of slavery, bitch!” Not charged as hate crime.
    – Native American woman suddenly says “I hate white people,” then punches random white woman in the face, knocking out one of her front teeth.” Not considered a hate crime.
    – Three black people beat a disabled white woman with hammers and crowbars, then burn her alive. When police later ask why, the ringleader explains, “I hate white people.” Again, not a hate crime.

    It’s also important to keep population size in mind. Non-Hispanic white people are currently about 62% of the US population so it’s possible to commit “the majority” of a certain type of crime while still being underrepresented as perpetrators of this crime.

  4. anti white propaganda. black on white violent crime is higher than white on white. this makes sense given that black men are about half of all violent criminals, according to FBI stats. when you remove blacks and hispanics, white violent crime rates are about the same as notoriously peaceful nordic countries. this anti white propaganda flies in the face of reality: a white person is safer statistically in a white neighborhood than a black or hispanic neighborhood.

  5. Nonsense. In 2017 there were 229 murders of blacks by whites. But 500 murders of whites by blacks. Blacks make up JUST 13 percent of the population which means that a WHITE person is 12 times MORE likely to be murdered by a black person than the other way around.

  6. In my experience, I have been assaulted by blacks and Hispanics – the former while in high school. A group of black male students turned out the hallway lights and hitting random white guys who pass by – such as myself. Perhaps not really a crime in that I wasn’t seriously injured but my point is that there are a lot of race based acts of violence – blacks against whites that either go unreported or are reported in the news media without any kind of a racial dimension being included in the story. However, any violent crime of a white person against an African-American is automatically deemed an act of hate without examining the circumstances.

    • Not as “irrefutable” or “searing” as the 90% Black on White or 64% Hispanic on White violent crime (not including murder which skews it even further), 2018 Bureau of Journal Statistics, Crime Victimization Survey.
      Further, White on White violent crime is impossible to compare with other racial groups due to a lack of domestic violence reporting by non-Whites.

  7. Nice try. Literally every other article on race published since the beginning of time says the exact opposite that blacks are many times more likely to attack whites than vice versa. Its not even close. This is like an Onion article. I guess anything can be put up on the internet whether its true or not and this article proves that.

  8. “Blacks/Hispanics assault and use weapons against Whites more often than Whites assault and use weapons against Blacks/Hispanics, but these relationships flip once we control for neighborhood and time effects in a panel data setting,” the authors wrote.

    I think this word salad roughly translates as “If we toss all the data we don’t like, then suddenly the data say what we want it to say.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *