Judge Gives Border Wall a Legal Green Light

Print More

A federal judge rejected a challenge to the Trump administration’s plans to build a wall on the Southern border with Mexico, NPR reports. The state of California and environmental groups sued, arguing that it was wrong to launch the border wall project by waiving several federal environmental laws. U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel ruled that the administration has not violated those laws, in essence giving the project a green light. Curiel is the same jurist who oversaw a separate lawsuit against Trump University. As a candidate, President Trump accused Curiel of bias because the Indiana-born judge is of Mexican ancestry. Trump called Curiel a “hater.”

The judge said his decision “cannot and does not consider whether the underlying decisions to construct the border barriers are politically wise or prudent.” He added, “As fellow Indiana native Chief Justice Roberts observed in addressing a case surrounded by political disagreement: ‘Court[s] are vested with the authority to interpret the law; we possess neither the expertise nor the prerogative to make policy judgments.” Curiel disagreed with the administration’s challengers who had argued that the government improperly waived environmental laws to begin construction of border wall prototypes and replacements for existing border fencing. The Center for Biological Diversity filed the first challenge against the administration. The group’s Brian Segee said, “We intend to appeal this disappointing ruling, which would allow Trump to shrug off crucial environmental laws that protect people and wildlife. The Trump administration has completely overreached its authority in its rush to build this destructive, senseless wall.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.