Justice Reform Subverted by Politics, says Bill Moyers

Print More

Political “ambition” and rhetoric have subverted efforts to reform the U.S. criminal justice system, says veteran TV journalist Bill Moyers.

“No other nation in the world permits its justice system to be organized around political ambition,” Moyers said in an interview aired Tuesday on CUNY-TV, the public network operated by the City University of New York.

Moyers said the practice in many jurisdictions across the country of electing judges and prosecutors clouds serious debate about challenges like prison reform by appealing to the kind of “tough on crime” rhetoric that appears to win elections—but is often unrelated to fact.

“You get political appeals, not the appeal of data and reason brought to bear,” said Moyers, who was most recently executive producer on “Rikers: An American Jail,” a hard-hitting documentary about New York’s troubled detention facility.

Moyers told Stephen Handelman, host of the monthly “Criminal Justice Matters” program and editor of The Crime Report, he believed there was a rising public awareness of the need for justice reforms in both “red states and blue states.”

But he added there was also a need for more public service journalism that could provide the facts required by the public to weigh the variety of options for change, especially at a moment when President Donald Trump and Attorney-General Jeff Sessions are arguing that the only way to deal with criminals “is to lock’em up and throw away the key.”

Moyers, who served as a special assistant to President Lyndon Baines Johnson when the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice was established in 1965, warned that many of the principles established in the commission’s landmark report were in danger of being reversed by the new administration.


President Lyndon Baines Johnson. Photo by manhhai via Flickr.

Recalling that LBJ had once told him that “A man’s judgment is no better than his information,” Moyers said the commission’s first challenge was to gather data on operations of the justice system that until then had never been tabulated on a national level.

“Data is the backbone of reform (and) in 1965 we had no national data on crime,” Moyer said. “We did not consider criminal justice as a system. Even LBJ believed that the federal government had nothing to do with local justice.”

After exploring the relationship among police, prosecutors, courts, and corrections, the commission report, released in 1967, developed recommendations aimed at making the prison system “less venal and the justice system more efficient,” said Moyers, whose 40-year career as a public broadcaster earned him 46 Emmys and nine Peabody Awards.

His groundbreaking public affairs series have included NOW with Bill Moyers (2002-05), Bill Moyers Journal (2007-10), and Moyers & Company (2011-15).

Moyers said such an approach was still crucial to helping raise public awareness of the need to develop further solutions to problems such as prison overcrowding or bail reform.

Editor’s Note: In March, a bipartisan group of Senators introduced legislation to create a national justice commission, the first nationwide review of the justice system since the LBJ commission 50 years ago.

Moyers described his Rikers film, released last year, as an effort to bring people face to face with the stories of those suffering from the “culture of brutality” in many jails across the country.

While “brilliant reporting” by journalists has exposed the patterns of violence that have made Rikers a notorious example of that culture, Moyers said he wanted to let former inmates speak directly to the camera, “unfiltered” by journalists, to bring those issues home.

He said that he hoped the film would prod authorities to undertake the reforms suggested by a New York City commission, chaired by former New York State Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman—including replacing Rikers with smaller facilities situated in the neighborhoods where many of the offenders came from.

“Until you see the person who is suffering (from the system), you can’t understand it on an emotional and conscientious level,” he said.

At the same time, he called on journalists to concentrate on policy and data, rather than be deflected by the political rhetoric.

Moyers was named last week by John Jay College and The Crime Report as the 2018 Justice Media Trailblazer, an annual honor recognizing individuals in the media and media-related fields who have made a major impact on the justice debate.

He will receive the award at a dinner at John Jay College in New York on Feb. 15, 2018.

Judge Lippman will introduce him.

The dinner is open to the public, but advance reservations are required. Information about the dinner is available here.

2 thoughts on “Justice Reform Subverted by Politics, says Bill Moyers

  1. I concur. The judicial system is rife with judges whose decisions are frequently overturned in higher courts. Maryland, where my family
    resides is exceptionally bad, since it is one of only three states that
    give an elected official ( the Governor) sole discretion on who is granted parole. Needless to say, politics drives this. Re-election drives it all and continues to impede by son’s release. Despite
    his incarceration at age sixteen; a Supreme Court Decision that has
    forced Maryland to consider him for parole; his exemplary record
    while incarcerated and news from the parole board that he has been
    recommended, he awaits yet another psych evaluation before any of it
    commences. As predicted, the wheels barely turn. Who knows when the giant backlog at Maryland’s sole psych facility will accommodate
    him? It would have not proceeded to the current level without the
    Intervention of the ACLU. My son has been locked up since 1992.
    Maryland seemed prepared to ignore Federal Law. I dare not be hopeful that the Governor will grant him a second chance.

    • Gender Bias is alive and well in Florida Courts. see Fl Supreme Court’s commission report of 1990 – Also Gender Bias THEN and NOW report!
      Bribery is used in Brevard and Volusia Circuits (see Mitch Needelman case where the former CLERK OF COURT was found guilty of corruption and BIBERY) —- my case directly shows clearly in the records that bribery was used and the court is fully aware of the concret evidence so they deny me access to their court system unlawfully after the Americans with Disabilities ACT was passed. Done to cover up the unlawful way a disabled victim was cheated out of her assets by TRICKERY and FRAUD ON THE COURT!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *