Miranda Ruling Cuts Crime Clearances, Profs Say

Print More

When the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to an attorney before questioning, four dissenting justices predicted that the decision would harm the ability of police to solve crimes. Two University of Utah professors say the passage of more than half a century has shown the seriousness of the consequences, the Salt Lake . . .

Want to read more? Please subscribe to The Crime Report!