Announcements of foiled terrorist plots make for lurid reading. They include schemes to carry out a Presidents Day jihadist attack on a train station in Kansas City, to bomb a Sept. 11 memorial event, to blow up a 1,000-pound bomb at Fort Riley, Ks.,, and detonate a weapon of mass destruction at a Wichita airport, reports the Kansas City Star. How much of it was real? Often not much, according to a review of recent terrorism cases investigated by the FBI in Kansas and Missouri. The most sensational plots invoking the name of the Islamic State or al-Qaida here were largely the invention of FBI agents carrying out elaborate sting operations on individuals identified through social media as being potentially dangerous.
In fact, in terrorism investigations in Wichita, at Fort Riley and last week in Kansas City, the alleged terrorists reportedly were unknowingly following the directions of undercover FBI agents who supplied fake bombs and came up with key elements of the plans. “What I get concerned about is where the plot is being hatched by the FBI,” said Michael German of the Brennan Center for Justice, a former FBI agent. “There has been a clear effort to manufacture plots.” Law enforcement has increasingly used undercover agents and informants to develop such cases in recent years, especially against people suspected of being inspired by the Islamic State. Of 126 Islamic State-related cases prosecuted by federal authorities across the U.S. since 2014, nearly two-thirds involved undercover agents or informants, says the Center on National Security at Fordham University School of Law in New York. The FBI has increased its use of sting operations, which were once seen as a tactic of last resort.