‘Reasonable Fear’ a Key in Police Shooting Protocols


Each time police officers draw their weapons, they step into a rigidly defined world where written rules, hours of training and Supreme Court decisions dictate not merely when a gun can be fired, but where it is aimed, how many rounds should be squeezed off and when the shooting should stop, says the New York Times. A grand jury will decide whether the Ferguson, Mo., police officer who fatally shot an unarmed African-American teenager two weeks ago followed his department’s 12 pages of police department regulations that govern officers' use of force.

But deciding whether an officer acted correctly in firing at a suspect is not cut and dried. A host of outside factors, from the officer's perception of a threat to the suspect's behavior and even his size, can emerge as mitigating or damning. Says one expert, “If a police officer has an objectively reasonable fear of an imminent threat to his life or serious bodily harm, he or she is justified in using deadly force.” “Objectively reasonable” is a standard set by the Supreme Court in 1989 when it said that a police officer's use of excessive force must be seen in the context of what reasonable officers would do in the same situation.

Comments are closed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.