Ethics Problems Arise In Three Capital Cases In Arizona Prosecutor’s Office


When a judge declared a mistrial in a Pinal County, Az., murder case last week due to actions of county prosecutors, it marked the third time in a month that ethics concerns were raised about the handling of death-penalty murder cases by the Pinal County Attorney’s Office, reports the Arizona Republic. Superior Court Judge Boyd Johnson declared a mistrial after learning that prosecutors misled him by secretly interviewing, without an attorney present, a defense witness who was facing charges in another case.

The case came days after the State Bar of Arizona opened an inquiry into how and why Pinal County prosecutors ignored a court order by viewing sealed documents in another death-penalty case. A day after the mistrial, prosecutors disclosed that a paralegal in the office “inadvertently” accessed off-limits documents in a third death-penalty case. Court officials and representatives of the County Attorney’s Office blame the missteps on a flawed case-management system, inadequate training and misguided judges. “It’s a bit mind-boggling,” said former Maricopa County Attorney Rick Romley, who served as lead prosecutor for more than 16 years. “There are serious problems in the Pinal County Attorney’s Office.”

Comments are closed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.