High Court Won’t Review NJ “Justifiable Need” Rule To Carry Gun In Public


The Supreme Court has refused to consider a case many analysts believed might have delivered another landmark Second Amendment decision expanding gun rights, reports the Christian Science Monitor. The action affirms lower court decisions upholding a New Jersey gun permit statute that critics say is too restrictive. The question was whether the New Jersey regulation violated a fundamental right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense.

The issue arrived at a time of heightened public concern about a stream of mass shootings at schools, job sites, and other public places. The challenged New Jersey law prohibits state residents from obtaining a permit to carry a handgun in public unless they can demonstrate a “justifiable need,” defined as “the urgent necessity for self-protection, as evidenced by specific threats or previous attacks which demonstrate a special danger to the applicant's life that cannot be avoided by means other than by issuance of a permit to carry a handgun.” New Jersey issues 600 permits per year in a state with 6.7 million adults, an approval rate that those challenging the law said is microscopically low.

Comments are closed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.