Despite Divided FL Shooting Verdict, Stand Your Ground Law Likely To Stay


The split decision by a sharply divided jury in Florida’s latest high-profile self-defense trial is prompting renewed calls for a review of the state’s controversial “stand your ground” law, while legal analysts try to make sense of the jury’s decision, Reuters reports. Michael Dunn, a 47-year-old software engineer, was convicted on Saturday on three counts of attempted murder for opening fire on a car of black teenagers during an argument over loud rap music in November 2012. The jury could not reach a verdict on a murder charge for killing one of the passengers.

Civil rights groups and some legislators are urging a review of Florida’s self-defense statute, saying it has created a license to kill for gun owners who hate or fear young black men. “We can’t ignore the 800-pound gorilla in the room. At the end of the day, if the race roles were reversed in both instances, there would be a full-on repeal,” said state Senator Dwight Bullard. Their chances may be slim: Gun rights activists, backed by a Republican-controlled legislature, say things are fine. State Rep. Dennis Baxley, a Republican who sponsored the law in 2005, said critics misunderstand the law’s intent, saying the statute has been used in hundreds of unheralded cases by black defendants citing their self-defense rights. “This narrative that says white people are tracking black people down and murdering them is just not true,” he said.

Comments are closed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.