Warrantless Wiretap in Islamic Jihad Case Expected to Face Supreme Court Test


The U.S. Justice Department for the first time has notified a criminal defendant that evidence being used against him came from a warrantless wiretap, reports the New York Times. The case of Jamshid Muhtorov is expected to set up a Supreme Court test of whether such eavesdropping is constitutional. Muhtorov who was charged in Colorado last year with providing material support to the Islamic Jihad Union, a terrorist organization based in Uzbekistan. Muhtorov is accused of planning to travel abroad to join the militants. Much of the government's case was based on e-mails and phone calls intercepted under a 2008 surveillance law.

The Times reported earlier that the decision by prosecutors to notify a defendant about the wiretapping followed a debate inside the Justice Department. It began in June when Solicitor General Donald. Verrilli discovered that the department's National Security Division did not notify criminal defendants when eavesdropping without a warrant was an early link in an investigative chain that led to evidence used in court. As a result, none of the defendants knew that they had the right to challenge the warrantless wiretapping law. The practice contradicted what Verrilli told the Supreme Court in a case challenging the law, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008.

Comments are closed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.