Court-Appointed Monitor Could Play Big Role in NYPD Oversight


A federal judge’s appointment of lawyer Peter Zimroth as a monitor to the New York Police Department over stop-and-frisk policies makes New York City just one of many around the U.S. subject to court oversight, says the New York Times. In Seattle, a monitor was chosen to address the incidence of discriminatory and baseless street stops of — the core complaint in the New York case — as well as problems with excessive force, particularly the use of batons and flashlights, often against people with mental illness. Typically, judges rely on court-appointed officials to ensure that the police are following court-ordered changes.

“In some cases, the monitors will write the policies; in other cases they say to the police department, 'You write the policies and I'll review it,' ” said Jeffrey Fagan of Columbia University, an expert witness for plaintiffs in the New York case. In rare circumstances, judges have permitted monitors to take a larger degree of operational control over a police department. In Oakland, CA, where the Police Department submitted to federal court oversight a decade ago, a dissatisfied judge named a compliance director, in addition to a monitor, and granted him broad authority to, in effect, run the department.

Comments are closed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.