Search Experts Following GPS Issue in Colorado Bank Robbery Case


A federal case in Colorado involving GPS tracking is being watched by Fourth Amendment lawyers and law enforcement experts, says the New York Times. The lawyer for a bank robbery suspect argues that a roadblock was unconstitutional, saying that the Fourth Amendment should keep the police from rounding up large groups of people at gunpoint based merely on a hunch.

Prosecutors argue that the roadblock was the safest option, given the potential for a high-speed chase. They said the tracking device showed that the bank robber was clearly at a specific intersection, allowing the police to tailor the roadblock. Judge William Martinez ruled the evidence admissible and that the detention of other motorists was justified, given that a potentially dangerous criminal was on the loose. The judge said he was troubled by the invasive tactics used by the police toward motorists caught in the blockade. The FBI used a hand-held tracking device to determine which vehicle was emitting the satellite signal, but it took nearly an hour for the FBI to get there.

Comments are closed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.