3,000 Could Seek New Terms if Voters OK CA Three-Strikes Change


Proposition 36 gives the California electorate another opportunity to weigh in on the state’s 18-year-old “three-strikes” law, the nation’s toughest career-criminal sentencing statute, says the Sacramento Bee. Twice in as many decades, voters have sided in favor of a three-strikes law that allows judges to impose a life prison term for offenders who commit a third felony – no matter how minor – if they have two previous serious or violent criminal convictions on their records. Proposition 36 proponents want to restrict the 25-years-to-life sentences, with some exceptions, to criminals whose third felony was serious or violent; nothing less than a residential burglary would qualify as a strike.

The measure would enable an estimated 3,000 of the 8,873 prisoners serving 25-years-to-life terms in the state as of June 30 to apply for resentencing hearings. If their motions for new terms are granted, a good number of those 3,000 prisoners could go free. The Legislative Analyst’s Office estimates Proposition 36 could save the state anywhere from $70 million to $90 million a year in reduced prison costs. Billionaire financier George Soros is supporting the measure with $500,000. David Mills, a Stanford law professor and private investment manager, matched and raised the contribution. Mills, a co-chair of the NAACP’s Legal Defense Fund, put in $878,000. He believes the sentencing measure’s “dramatic effect on poor people and African Americans” makes it one of the leading civil rights issues of the day.

Comments are closed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.