Convicted Texas Pedophile Challenges Test as Junk Science


Charged with molesting two young cousins, Michael Arena of Texas was summoned to a psychologist to measure his sexual attraction to children. The test required the 16-year-old to click through images of swimsuit-clad people of various ages while the computer secretly measured how long he viewed each photo. The results, said a prosecution-hired psychologist, said Arena was a pedophile who was a “high risk” to strike again, says the Austin American-Statesman.

Prosecutors cited the test in Arena’s 1999 trial, urging jurors to choose prison to protect children from a teen “diagnosed as a pedophile by an expert.” The jury responded with a 20-year sentence. Now 29, Arena still has 7½ years left on his sentence. “Since the trial, his accusers have recanted, saying they lied about being sexually assaulted at the urging of their mother, who was embroiled in a bitter custody battle. Troubling details about the psychological test also have emerged, prompting Arena’s lawyers to pursue an appeal designed to gain his freedom based on innocence or grant Arena a new sentencing that excludes a psychological test that defense lawyers deride as junk science. The Texas Supreme Court is weighing both requests, which are opposed by prosecutors.

Comments are closed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.