GA Davis Case Raises Questions On Adequacy of Clemency Pleas


Doubts raised about the guilt of Troy Davis, who is expected to be executed tonight in Georgia for killing a police officer, raise new questions about the Supreme Court’s determination that “executive clemency” – the power of a governor or review board to commute a death row sentence – is an adequate fail-safe for assessing death-row innocence claims, says the Christian Science Monitor.

“If a case like this doesn’t result in clemency, which is a discretionary process that calls a halt to an execution based on doubt surrounding the integrity of the verdict, then it suggests that clemency as a traditional fail-safe is not adequate,” says James Acker, a criminologist at SUNY-Albany. “The Davis case raises doubts about the discretionary clemency process and ultimately raises doubts about whether the legal system can tolerate this potential error in allowing a person to be executed.” While the number of people executed in the U.S. has dwindled over the past 15 years, a majority of Americans – about 64 percent – still support the death penalty. At a recent presidential candidate debate, a crowd cheered when Texas Gov. Rick Perry, the current Republican frontrunner, noted the 234 executions carried out under his watch.


Comments are closed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.