After Court Ruling, DC Crafts Rules To Deter Gun Ownership


When the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the District of Columbia’s 32-year ban on handguns in 2008, it seemed to promise a more permissive era in America’s long tussle over gun ownership. But since then, the city has crafted rules that are proving a new, powerful deterrent to residents who want to buy firearms, reports the Wall Street Journal. Legal gun owners must be registered by the city, a red flag for many in the gun-rights community concerned that registration lists could be used to confiscate firearms. The District limits the number of bullets a gun can hold and the type of firearm residents can buy. It requires that by next year manufacturers sell guns equipped with a special identification technology–one that hasn’t yet been adopted by the industry.

The experience of Washington suggests a pro-gun ruling by the Supreme Court doesn’t mean an end to the matter. There, the battle over whether residents can own guns has been replaced by a fresh debate over whether lawmakers can restrict legal gun ownership. Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia’s non-voting representative in Congress, is blunt about the point of the city’s laws: discouraging gun ownership. “To get them you have to go through a bureaucracy that makes it difficult,” she said in an interview. Her constituents tend to oppose firearms because of gun violence, she said.

Comments are closed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.