Justices Wrestle With Prison “Good Time”–195,000 Affected


Supreme Court justices yesterday wrestled with the standard for calculating good-time credits for federal prison sentences, reports Law.com. The issue is the interpretation of a “term of imprisonment” under the federal good-time credit statute. Federal inmates argue that they should be eligible for the statutory 54 days of good-time credit for each year of their entire sentence as originally imposed. The Bureau of Prisons contends that the calculation of good-time credit is based only on time actually served by the prisoner.

Stephen Sady, an Oregon public defender representing inmates, argued that the government’s interpretation of the statute would short-change the prisoners’ opportunity to earn good-time credits, unfairly lengthening their sentences. Assistant to the Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall told the justices that the petitioners’ method of calculating a year of imprisonment, subtracting the 54 days of credit, wrongly creates a 311-day cycle for good-time credit eligibility. Justice Stephen Breyer expressed concern about awarding good-time credit for what he termed “phantom time” — time sentenced but not actually served. Justice John Paul Stevens seemed concerned about the implications of the government’s position, telling Wall: “You say there are 195,000 sentences affected by this rule. I don’t know which way that cuts. If there are 195,000 people spending [] significantly more time in jail than they should, that’s kind of troublesome.”

Comments are closed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.