US Supreme Court Reviewing AZ Insanity Defense Rules

Print

The New York Times reports that the U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing the case of Eric M. Clark, who spent three years in a mental hospital before being found mentally competent to stand trial for killing a police officer, but was unable to use an insanity defense because of a combination of Arizona statutes and judicial decisions that limit evidence of mental illness.

The high court has never ruled that the U.S. Constitution requires a state to allow an explicit insanity defense, but most states either allow such a plea or give a defendant the ability to present evidence of diminished mental capacity. In Arizona, by contrast, such evidence is barred from the trial.

Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/20/washington/20scotus.html

Comments are closed.