Alito Has Voted To Uphold Most Death Sentences


Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. was on the panel that did not stop the 1999 execution of so-called House of Horrors murderer Gary Heidnik, and he has rejected other death-row appeals in his 15 years on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, reports the Philadelphia Inquirer. He wrote the majority opinion turning down the claims of a killer sentenced to death in Lehigh County, Pa. – only to be overturned this year by the U.S. Supreme Court. Alito, nominated Monday to the Supreme Court, also has ruled in favor of murder defendants. He was on a three-judge panel that ordered a new penalty hearing in a York County case, and this year, he was part of a panel that upheld a ruling that a death sentence was unconstitutional.

“He doesn’t have a fixed opinion,” lawyer Peter Goldberger said about how his Yale Law classmate might view death-penalty cases if confirmed to the high court. Timothy Lewis, a former Third Circuit judge and death-penalty opponent, believes Alito’s “natural inclination toward judicial restraint” means that he would only reluctantly interfere with a death sentence. In the case decided by the high court this year, a convict cited ineffectiveness of a lawyer who failed to get records that might have persuaded a jury to vote for a life sentence, rather than death. Alito rejected the claim, which a dissenting judge called “shocking ineffective assistance of counsel.” In a 5-4 ruling joined by Sandra Day O’Connor, whom Alito would replace, the Supreme Court overturned the death sentence and said court-appointed trial lawyers had failed to look adequately for mitigating evidence.


Comments are closed.


You have Free articles left this month.

Want access to all our reporting? Subscribe for unlimited access or login.