Covering California’s Three Strikes Law

Print More
176850900_faaa8f192c

Photo by Opus2008 via Flickr

On May 2 and 3, 2011, twenty-five California journalists met with state and local officials and a range of criminal justice experts on the campus of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, to examine California’s so-called “Three Strikes Law” and its impact on the state’s criminal justice system, in advance of a possible referendum for repeal in 2012.  Access the agenda here.

The law, passed after a 1994 statewide ballot initiative triggered by several grisly crimes  perpetrated by former felons, changed the state’s sentencing rules to  require a minimum sentence of 25 years to life for three-time repeat offenders with multiple prior serious or violent felony convictions. More than 25 states have introduced similar “Three Strikes and You’re Out” sentencing rules, but California is the only state  to allow a “non-serious” non-violent  felony to count as a third strike.

The majority of participating speakers argued that the law, passed in 1994, should be repealed or at least significantly modified.  They noted that the legislation has been an important contributor to the state’s seriously overcrowded prison system.  But several maintained that it has made Californians safer, and should not be changed.

Keynote speaker Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley argued that Three Strikes should be modified so that a person could only be prosecuted for a violent or “serious” third strike; and should also be changed to allow those already serving three strikes sentences for petty crimes to petition a judge for their release.

Erwin Chemerinsky, the Dean of the UC Irvine school of Law―who unsuccessfully argued the law’s unconstitutionally before the U.S. Supreme Court―declared that the law should be entirely rescinded. “The most persuasive studies show that (the law)_ has had no positive effect when it comes to crime,” he said. “New York has had a greater decrease in crime than California, and it has no three-strikes law.”

However, Gregg Totten, the Ventura County District Attorney and Vice President of the pro-three strikes California District Attorney’s Association said that the law should remain as is: “In my judgment and in my colleague’s judgment, [the law] has been discerningly used.”  He was supported by former Kern County District Attorney Ed Jagels, a three strikes supporter, who said, ”We feel that Three Strikes (in California) targets exactly the kind of people that need to be targeted.”  He added: “If you incarcerate someone for longer than you might otherwise, you lessen his crime life.”

The politics of changing the law, much less getting a new referendum on the ballot,  are likely to remain a serious obstacle.

“Let me show you the bullet wounds on my back,”  joked former State Senator Gloria Romero as she described her unsuccessful efforts to modify the law at a time when California’s Democratic caucus suffered from “real political paralysis.”   The central issue worrying lawmakers about any kind of criminal justice reform is not about the specific policy, she said, but “about being [called] soft on crime.”  This was supported by

Steve Cooley, who said he was “persona non grata” with many members of the California District Attorneys’ Association because of his own attempts to reform the law.

Nevertheless, many of the panelists said it should be a priority for the administration of recently elected Gov. Jerry Brown.  Acting San Francisco District Attorney George Gascon (who is currently running as a candidate for the next DA elections) said that the Three Strikes law had contributed to “families being destroyed.” Gascon, who served as chief of San Francisco’s police force before being appointed acting DA, said, “We have to ask ourselves (if)  being tough on crime is reducing crime and making it sustainable. We have a 70 percent recidivism rate [in California] and we think [our criminal justice system] works.”

Michael Romano, Director of Stanford University’s Three Strikes Project called California’s three strikes law, the “worst in the country,” and pointed to cases where defendants had received three strikes 25-year-to-life sentences for “possession of a stolen cell phone,” the theft of two faucets from a Home Depot or  attempting to steal a car radio. Several former felons and their relatives also spoke out against the law.

The two-day conference, co-sponsored by the John Jay College Center on Media, Crime and Justice and the USC Annenberg School School for Communication and Journalism, was supported by the Public Welfare Foundation. It was entitled:  “The Future of California’s Three Strikes Law: Reform, Repeal, or the Status Quo? How can the Media Stay Ahead of the Story?”     Other co-sponsors were the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office and the San Francisco District Attorney’s office. For the workshop agenda, conference materials and stories produced from the event, please see below.

Fellows Stories

Three Strikes and the Prison Industrial Complex under Review
Rose Davis, Indian Voices
Download the story »
Quadriplegic prisoner is first in California to get medical parole hearing
Sam Stanton, Sacramento Bee
Read the full story »
“Three strikes” foes see hope in ruling
Dana Littlefield, San Diego Union-Tribune
Download the story »
Political Paralysis’ in Calif. Over Prison Reform
Marisa Lagos , The San Francisco Chronicle
Download the story »
Renewed call for reform Stanford lands cherished collection of state’s Three Strikes Law Works conservatively estimated
Tracey Kaplan, San Jose Mercury News
Download the story »
Field Poll: California Voters Favor Revamping “Three-Strikes” Law
Sam Stanton, The Sacramento Bee
Download the story »
Battle over California’s Three Strikes Law reflected in faces of now-freed prisoners for life
Tracey Kaplan, San Jose Mercury News
Read the full story »
California ‘three strikes’ sentences used less often 15 years later
Andy Furillo, Sacramento Bee
Read the full story »
Fiscal and prison overcrowding crises could lead to Three-Strikes reform
Paul Rosynsky, Oakland Tribune, Contra Costa Times and other papers in our Bay Area newspaper chain
Download the story » Read the full story »
Voters want “3 strikes” reform, but fate of ballot initiative unclear
Ryan Gabrielson, California Watch
Download the story »
Is CA’s 3-Strikes good or bad law? State & Local officials contemplate the question
Celeste Fremon, WitnessLA
Download the story »
California’s Three Strikes Reform Advocates Look Hard at 2012 Ballot Measure
Mary Slosson, Neon Tommy
Download the story »
Margaret Prescod interviews Obie Anthony, recently released as wrongly convicted after 17 years in prison
Margaret Prescod , KPFK-FM
Read the full story »
Sonali Kolhatkar interviews Peter Eliasberg of the SoCal ACLU
Sonali Kolhatkar , KPFK-FM
Read the full story »
Is CA’s 3-Strikes Good or Bad Law? State & Local Officials Contemplate the Question
Celeste Fremon, Witness LA
Read the full story »
Stanford law professors submit proposed initiative to limit Three Strikes Law
Tracey Kaplan, The Mercury News
Read the full story »
‘3 strikes’: Proposed law tries to restore intent
Marisa Lagos, San Francisco Chronicle
Read the full story »
Advocates of scaling back California’s tough Three-Strikes law hope for place on ballot
,
Read the full story »
Softer California three-strikes law would save on older inmates
By Dan Levine and Mary Slosson, Reuters
Read the full story »
Prison Break: California Rethinks Criminal Justice
Scott Schafer, KQED and the Center for Investigative Reporting
Read the full story »
In L.A. Prison Realignment, a New Focus on Mental Health
Scott Schafer, The California Report
Read the full story »
Record Numbers of State’s Lifer Inmates Granted Parole
Scott Shafer, The California Report
Read the full story »
For ‘Lifers’ Paroled, Stepping Into Life Beyond Bars Isn’t Always Easy
Scott Shafer, KQED News
Read the full story »
New Classes Aim to Help Paroled ‘Lifer’ Inmates After Release
Scott Shafer, KQED News
Read the full story »
Behind California’s Dramatic Increase in Lifers Freed from Prisons
Scott Shafer, KQED News
Read the full story »

Resources from the Conference

“The Public Safety Impacts of the Three Review of the Research Strikes Law in California: Research Highlights”by Barry Krisberg and Sarah Lawrence, University of California, Berkeley School of Law Download file

“Striking Out: California’s Three Strike Law Has Not Reduced Violent Crime,”by Michael Males, the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice Download file

“Impact of Three Strikes on the Criminal Justice System”by Anthony Simbol, Legislative Analyst’s Office (California) Download file

Keynote Speech, Steve Cooley, District Attorney, Los Angeles County Please use these notes with full audio provided of DA Cooley’s speech. Download file

Conference Audio

. . .

.

Keynote Speech: Steve Cooley, Los Angeles District Attorney

Download file

.

.

Panel 1: History & Politics of Three Strikes

Download file

.

.

Panel 2: Impact on Prison Overcrowding

Download file

.

.

Keynote Speech: Greg Totten, District Attorney, Ventura County, CA

Download file

.

.

Panel 3: Stanford Law School, “Three Strikes Clinic”

Download file

.

.

Panel 4: “Crimes and Misdemeanors”

Download file

.

.

Keynote Speech: Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, University of California, Irvine, School of Law

Download file

.

.

Panel 5: Law Enforcement and Public Safety

Download file

.

.

Panel 6: The Data Behind Three Strikes

Download file

.

.

Panel 7: The Politics of Three Strikes

Download file

.

.

Panel 8: Alternatives to the Three Strikes Law

Download file

.

.

“Three Strikes” ballot by Scott Shafer, The California Report

Download file

.

.

Three Strikes Symposium–KPFK News Report

Download file

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *